Powered by

New research sheds some light on spanking

Corporal punishment may lead to lower IQs down the road, study says

 Email Print   
By Robyn Monaghan
Monday, October 26, 2009
 
 

Parents who spank their child know they are hurting the little one's back side, if even a little bit. But emerging studies show they may be damaging the thinking end as well.

New research from the University of New Hampshire claims spanked children have lower IQs than those whose caregivers spare the rod.

SpankingChart

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

A recent university study found that kids who were
spanked had IQs that were, on average, four points
lower than thse who weren't.

University of New Hampshire Professor Murray Straus and colleagues studied nationally representative samples of more than 17,000 2- to 9-year-olds in 32 countries. When they re-tested four years later, researchers found the younger and more often kids get spanked, the more impact on their brains.

The connection between spanking and smarts doesn't seem like brain surgery to Dr. David Finn, a psychologist specializing in parenting and domestic violence who teaches positive discipline techniques at Associates in Human Development Counseling in Rolling Meadows.

"It'shard for a child to develop trust when the same person who can heal a skinned knee with a kiss can also inflict pain at will," Finn says.

Corporal punishment goes hand-in-hand with blocked brainpower because it becomes a chronic stressor for young children, research shows. The anxiety shows up like symptoms of post-traumatic stress as toddlers grow constantly fearful and easily startled. That means crucial connections in the brain donít hook up and IQ digits dip, experts found.

Street smarts

In the mid-'90s, Straus, a national anti-spanking guru, published a precursor to this yearís study, "Beating the Devil out of Them: Corporal Punishment in American Families and its Effects on Children." It established that corporal punishment produces the opposite of the desired effect. His new study shows that in prosperous countries, fewer parents use corporal punishment and national IQ averages are higher.

In a metro area that is becoming a national poster city for youth violence, Chicago public policy experts are looking to parenting techniques that offer alternatives to corporal punishment as a possible root fix for wildly escalating hostility among inner city young people.

In spite of mounting evidence that spanking a tot (or a teen) does more harm than good, spreading the anti-spanking doctrine is still a hard sell, Finn and other Chicago area parenting professionals say.

"Parents learn to parent from their own parents, so they seem to think it is their right to spank," Finn says.

Rush University College of Nursing professor Dr. Deborah Gross got that message right from the mommiesí mouths when she rounded up a test group of low-income parents to shape The Chicago Parent Program. This training program now helps families in Chicago's inner city youth programs and Head Start centers.

When leaders of the focus group asked how many parents in the room had been spanked as a child, everyone raised a hand. In fact, the parent advisory group said giving time-outs instead of spanking was a prime example of why they view white kids as "spoiled and ìill-mannered," Gross says in a paper about the program.

Hard sell

Gross quickly got the message that billing the workshops as a no-spanking program would assure it also would wind up as a no-participant program.

"You lose that war," she says. "It's hard for parents to understand the toxic effects of spanking because a lot of them were spanked and still felt loved."

Instead, The Chicago Parent Program of Rush University created eight keys to effective discipline that gently nudged parents away from hitting and toward subtler, gentler forms of getting behavior changes.

"A lot of these parents told us they don't want to spank their kids. They just don't know what else to do," Gross says. "We gave them other tools they could use to get the behavior they were looking for."

Much to some parents' surprise, nonviolence worked. Parents in training interventions reported they resorted less to yelling, spanking and hitting than comparison groups, Gross says. And the kids were behaving better. Follow-up surveys and observations showed children of parents who completed training werenít whining, back talking or acting out so much at day care.

Research from at least one national study found that kids whose families go through first-rate parenting programs like The Chicago Parent Program wind up with 60 percent fewer arrests.

Whatever works

Most of Finn's clients don't come from inner city neighborhoods, yet as many as 80 percent of them grapple with good ways to discipline their offspring, he says. But, in the suburbs as well as the city, turning away from the quick fix of a whack to the backside can be tough tactic to reform.

"Parents get short-term reinforcement from spanking because the child stops the offending behavior, looks downcast and apologizes," Finn says. "What they donít realize is that the child is really learning how to get away with it, to fear the parent and to be less honest."

It's not just that spanking is harmful to the growing minds of toddlers all the way up to teens (the strongest link between corporal punishment and IQ found in the study was for those spanked as teens). Finn and Straus both say that, for all its instant feel-bad upshots, spanking simply doesn't work.

"I tell parents that if spanking worked, theyíd only have to do it once," Finn says. "Instead, they end up having to do it over and over and resorting to escalating levels of violence."

This article appeared in the 2009 November edition of Chicago Parent.

Robyn Monaghan is a mother and long-time journalist.

See more of Robyn's stories here.

 
 
 
Spanking is not necessary

By Marianne Boulos on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I raised six children and I know first hand from my experience that spanking is not necessary and a child is actually better behaved if you never spank, because they trust you, look up to you and always want your approval. Being a source of consistent unconditional love is the greatest gift you can give a child, and that gift comes back to you ten fold. I know this because my quiver is full. I have 11 grandchildren who have responsible parents. I can understand why some might mistakenly think that the kids that don't get spanked are the same kids that you'd consider to be undisciplined, but in fact it is the ones that have been punished with being hit that have the discipline problem because they build a protective shell and part of that shell is not caring about pleasing parents or teachers. Then there are the children who are never punished, not even in educational ways but instead they are spoiled and allowed to run the house...well obviously these children will have a discipline problem and also a real rude awakening in life. I like to make the punishment fit the crime and I also like to make the punishment benefit me the victim of their acts of naughtiness (seems fair), so for example a punishment for making a mess is simply cleaning the mess, and whining in the store would never be rewarded with actually getting what they whined about. Kids learn real quick this way..it really only takes one time and they remember. My kids would tell you that they behaved because they didn't want to hear the long lecture, Yes a calm lecture is not only educational but is considered punishment to a child. I have raised six respectful, hard working, even tempered, children who were disciplined with love. Spanking is just a release of the parents stress and has no long term benefits and kids who are spanked typically misbehave more when they know you can't spank them...that explains a lot of the naughty children in public. I guarantee you that...Taking the time to explain may take longer then a swat but the rewards last a lifetime. Spank a child and they behave for a while (out of fear of you) Teach a child how to behave and they behave for a life time.

Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

By PDeverit on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE: Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit. Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit. I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do. There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals: Plain Talk About Spanking by Jordan Riak, The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children by Tom Johnson, NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D. Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net. Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center For Effective Discipline, PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals, Churches' Network For Non-Violence, Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps, Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Concerned

By Betty on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I applaud Chicago Parent for drawing attention to this issue. I disagree with D who commented that Chicago Parent did not provide other alternatives, there were service providers and research clearly listed in this article. Further more, D makes dangerous assumptions when she/he states that 'most parents that spank know not to go overboard'. Who gets to decide what is overboard? Certainly not the child who recieves the physical abuse. I do not think this article advocates for a lack of discipline, but rather encourages parents to re-evaluate what they do, how they do it and why. Many parents turn to spanking out of frustration, and therefore may not be able to fully assess what is 'overboard'. It is a question of parents needing to pay more attention to their child and have more patience to support their children's growth, not only by being attentive and patient but setting safe and firm boundaries. And while the article may not be as comprehensive as one may need, well I think parents can do that research on their own and should have already considered how to develop some alternative discipline techniques besides just spanking. Like the article says, if it was so effective why would you ever have to do it more than once? Parents 'who have no clue' should have sought some more help prior to making the decision to have a child at all.

Spanking

By Deanna Reynolds on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I am very upset about the article about spanking. It's a parent's right to choose how to punish a child for bad behavior. Most parents that spank know not to go overboard. I do understand that there are some parents out there that go too far into abuse. Here's a few problems I see. 1) There is such a huge push for parents not to spank their child, that if a child needs a spank in public, parents are afraid to spank their child for fear that someone will call the authorities. 2) From a teacher's perspective (former, that is) I've noticed that most parents who choose not to spank choose no discipline at all. Far too many children in school have no respect for teachers or authority. It's not the teacher's job to teach your child how to behave...it's the parent's job. Too many times I called parents when a child has misbehaved and had the parent say "so?" If there is no follow through at home, then a consequence at school is ineffective. 3) Parents today are so afraid of what others will think if they reprimand another person's child. How many times have you watched your child get pushed around on the playground while parents and caregivers are yakking with their friends, oblivious to what their child is doing? I asked some children very politely to please be careful around the younger children, only to have the parent tell me not to reprimand her children. Wake up, people! Your children need to learn good manners, and if you're not doing it, then at least let someone do it for you. 4) I guarantee you that some parents who read this article are not going to do any other research about the topic, and will say to themselves, "that decides it. If we spank our child, they'll be stupid". If you are going to publish an article about discipline, at least present information in support of the other as well. 5) Those little guidelines you put at the bottom of the page are so inefficient. If you are going to publish an article about not spanking, offer advice on what to do instead. A few little tidbits isn't enough for parents who have no clue what steps to take next. At least offer websites parents can go to and get more information. Sadly, the government is taking more control over how we raise our children. As an adoptive parent, I signed papers from DCFS saying I would not use corporal punishment with my child. Spanking was never my first choice of punishment, but now if time outs and other consequences don't work, spanking is not an option. My friends that choose to spank do so in a very loving way. Their children are not terrified of their parents, and they understand that it is a consequence of certian behaviors. I'm disappointed that Chicago Parent magazine provided no other information for parents to turn to. Telling parents that their child's IQ will be lower if they spank and then not providing enough information on alternatives is negligent. D. from River Forest

Directories

Entertainers/Party Supplies
Nannies
Home-based business
Resale