Two weeks ago, I wrote a post
about depressed preschoolers. The New York Times ran a story in which experts say they can accurately
diagnose cases of documented clinical depression in kids as young
as three. This is both new (it had previously been thought that
brains that young simply weren't sophisticated enough to be
depressed) and frightening (one more thing to add to the worry
Last week, the Times wrote another story under the headline: "Child's Ordeal Shows
Risks of Psychosis Drugs for Young." It focused on Kyle Warren, a
now-6-year-old from Louisiana who, by the age of 18 months, was on
enough anti-psychotic drugs to stock a pharmacy shelf. The gist of
the piece was that in a rush to diagnose and treat behavioral
issues in kids, doctors are often prescribing powerful drugs with
powerful side effects.
Both stories were well-reported, backed up by panels of experts
and data. Both were compelling, with 6-year-old Kyle rivaled by
4-year-old Kiran, who once told his mother, referring to the
family's upcoming trip to Disney World, "Mickey
lies. Dreams don't come true."
So what's a parent to do? Two stories, from one of the nation's
most reputable news sources. One says we treat too much, to
devastating results. One says we can treat more, and make a
meaningful difference in the lives of kids.
There's truth in both stories, which is that when there's enough
data and professional consensus among doctors to merit a diagnosis,
treatment is the way to go. But sometimes I wonder whether the
competing swarm of health-related headlines, delivered to a hungry
audience of parents who want nothing more in the world than for
their kids to be healthy, isn't just confusing.
When is news just noise?
What to do with your weekend, delivered every Thursday.
Great deals and chances to win prizes, delivered every Monday.
Exclusive offers from our partners,usually delivered twice a week.
Resources for parents of children with special needs,delivered the second Tuesday each month.