Psychology Today isn't often on my reading list, but in
my daily search for the bizarre and trivial parenting news across
the Web, I found this blog post, titled "Parenting: Unconditional
Love is Bad!"
I was intrigued.
The blogger, a psychologist named Jim Taylor, went on to argue
that in the big picture of parenting, unconditional love is neither
the historical norm nor a good idea:
Rewarding children -- love is really the ultimate form of reward
-- regardless of their behavior robs children of one of their most
important lessons-that their actions have consequences. What more
powerful inducement to good action is there for your child than the
threat of losing your love? ... Most things in life have strings
attached and love is no different.
Assuming Taylor is right, and that unconditional love is a
relatively new phenomenon, then this goes hand-in-hand with the spanking debate,
which I've written about previously. Both represent a more liberal
trend within parenting philosophies over the past half-century.
Love more, hit less. Reward good behavior rather than punish bad
behavior. Kids should love their parents rather than fear them.
What do you think? Should parental loved have to be earned? Or
is it a birthright?
What to do with your weekend, delivered every Thursday.
Great deals and chances to win prizes, delivered every Monday.
Exclusive offers from our partners,usually delivered twice a week.
Resources for parents of children with special needs,delivered the second Tuesday each month.