Share and discuss your
opinion about this on Facebook
Am I the only one ready to draw the curtain on the media-hyped
catfight between Ann Romney and Hilary Rosen? Yet again, the
political establishment has tried to pit working moms against
stay-at-home moms in a thinly veiled attempt to drum up more votes
for the November election. Only this time, for the most part, we're
not biting. Is this progress, or are we missing the point
I ask this as another tax season wraps up and my financial
contribution to my household is - once again - close to being a sad
and lonely zero. I know, I know. Taking care of my child is a job,
taking care of the house is a job, and taxes should be a breakdown
of my family's income, not a measurement of my own self-worth.
Plus, I actually do work - a ton - as the head of Families in the
Loop, where I'm re-investing the majority of my earnings right back
into the business.
Yet in the last few weeks, as I've been bombarded by rants on
both sides of the Romney/Rosen debate and read reviews of such
books as The Conflict: How Modern Motherhood Undermines the Status
of Women, the issue for me is not only about whether being a
stay-at-home mom is a job or if "women who run meth labs receive
more public affirmation than at-home mothers do" (an actual comment
on the NY Times website). The question that I wrestle with is:
Should we women be financially dependent on our spouses in the
If you had asked me this 10 or even five years ago, my answer
would have been an unequivocal no. Like so many other women out
there, I watched my mom struggle financially after her divorce and
I promised myself I'd never be in that situation. I worked my tail
off in college, gained experience abroad, and even earned a
master's degree from an Ivy League institution. This, I determined,
would ensure that I would never have to rely on anyone else.
Then, for a variety of reasons - a baby, two relocations, and
the worst economy since the Great Depression - I found myself
without a steady income. What was once my worst nightmare became my
reality: my husband is the primary breadwinner (see, it's even a
competition; he's the "winner."). To my surprise, however, it's not
the degrading, gold-digging, desperate housewife experience I
thought it would be. In fact, it feels nice to be taken care
I have to admit, though, that I miss seeing those bi-weekly pay
stubs. I miss making decisions about my 401K, and I definitely miss
purchasing items bought with my money that I put into my checking
account. I then find myself playing a game of "What if'?" What if
something happens to my spouse, or what happens if we divorce? Do I
want to be 40+ with no financial security? Do I want to be fighting
over alimony and saying things such as "the level to which I'm
accustomed" to a judge? The answer to these questions is an
emphatic "Hell, NO. "
Which brings me back to the Romney/Rosen debate. Anyone who has
taken care of kids for a week - heck, even a day - knows that being
a primary caregiver is a job. And a tough one, with no paycheck and
no healthcare benefits.
The choice of whether or not to stay with the kids, if we're
lucky enough to have the choice, is about more than being with our
kids all day or a checking account balance. It's also about the
power dynamics in our marriages, our relationships with money, and
our fears about being financially dependent on another person.
Wouldn't it be nice if we transformed a tired debate about working
vs. staying at home into a constructive conversation about how
women across the mommy spectrum do not have the support they need?
Now that would be change I can believe in.
Wendy Widom is CEO of Familes in the Loop (FITL), Chicago's hippest hub for parents and kids.
See more of Wendy 's stories here.
What to do with your weekend, delivered every Thursday.
Great deals and chances to win prizes, delivered every Monday.
Exclusive offers from our partners,usually delivered twice a week.
Resources for parents of children with special needs,delivered the second Tuesday each month.